By Ann Wolbert Burgess and Steven Matthew Constantine
I loved Mindhunter, the 2017 Netflix series based on the 1995 book Mindhunter: Inside the FBI's Elite Serial Crime Unit by retired FBI agent John Douglas. I also really loved the character Dr Wendy Carr, the psychologist who collaborated with Holden Ford and Bill Tench.
The trio had fictional names but their characters were based on actual people and/or composites of members of the Behavioral Science Unit at the FBI Academy in Quantico, Virginia. It wasn't until I came across a Facebook post (one of those 'A Day in History' sites), about Dr Ann Burgess when I realized she was the real-life inspiration for Dr Wendy Carr. It was likely written by AI, but still, it got me wanting to know more.
1975. Quantico, Virginia. FBI agents Robert Ressler and John Douglas had been driving across America for months, sitting in prison cells, recording interviews with the most violent criminals in the country. They had hours of tape. Detailed confessions. Direct access to the minds of serial killers. And absolutely no idea what to do with it.
Ann Burgess listened to the first recording and delivered the verdict that would reshape criminal investigation forever: "This isn't research. This is just... stories."
The agents stared at her.
She continued: "You're asking them to talk about themselves. But you're not collecting data. You're not following methodology. You can't compare one interview to another because every conversation is different."
Silence.
"You're sitting on something extraordinary," Burgess said. "But the way you're doing this? It's scientifically worthless."
It seemed like the FB post totally dramatized the entire exchange because this dialogue wasn't even mentioned in Burgess' book at all! But it hooked me nonetheless.
Ann Burgess hadn't planned to revolutionize criminal justice. She was a psychiatric nursing professor at Boston College. A researcher studying trauma. She was also a wife and mother of three. The FBI found her because of a groundbreaking paper she'd published in 1974 about rape trauma—proving that sexual assault caused lasting psychological damage at a time when courts barely recognized it. An agent read it and thought: We need this woman.
She was invited to give one lecture at Quantico about rape victimology. She ended up redesigning how the FBI investigates violent crime. The problem was obvious once she pointed it out: The Behavioral Science Unit was brilliant but chaotic. They believed you could profile unknown offenders by studying crime patterns—revolutionary for the 1970s, when most law enforcement considered it pseudoscience.
This part was at least true, according to Ann Burgess' 2021 book, A Killer By Design. It gave a fairly comprehensive overview of how the BSU evolved as well as the most famous cases they helped solve. It also wasn't quite what I expected. First of all, Burgess was very proud of her pioneering work with rape survivors. Over several years, Burgess had interviewed victims and documented how trauma worked—the phases, the coping mechanisms, the fear responses that made victims comply with their attackers. She'd proven that sexual violence wasn't about desire, it was about power and control.
When Burgess joined the BSU, she applied that framework to murderers and serial killers and helped redesign the entire interview protocol. She created structured questionnaires so that every interview collected comparable data. She introduced victimology as the key to understanding the perpetrator—learnng details about the victims revealed offender selection patterns. She distinguished between "MO" (method that evolves with practice) and "signature" (psychological needs that stay consistent). She mapped escalation patterns to identify offenders earlier. In short, she established a scientific methodology for the early stages of criminal profiling.
So I was surprised how Burgess seemed to downplay her early contributions at the FBI. The FB post also made it seem like Burgess had been overlooked. In nearly every article, the credit went to FBI agents Ressler and Douglas. Ann Burgess's name appeared once, maybe twice, buried deep in the text. This became the pattern. But from what Burgess wrote, she wasn't interested in being featured in newspaper articles, she was more effective behind the scenes. Even though Burgess was the only woman at the BSU, the agents seemed to really value and respect her.
But Mindhunter, despite being an excellent show, was probably to blame for misportraying Ann Burgess. Most viewers never knew Dr. Wendy Carr was based on a real person. Those who did assumed the show was accurate.
For years afterward, people approached Burgess at conferences asking if it was hard being closeted in the FBI in the 1970s.
She'd smile and correct them: "I'm not gay. I didn't move to Quantico. I'm not a psychologist. I'm a psychiatric nurse. And I have three children."
As if her actual story—mother of three, psychiatric nurse, revolutionized criminal profiling while commuting from Boston—wasn't interesting enough.
I wonder if this was one of the reasons why, at 85 years old, Burgess finally published her own account: A Killer by Design. Apparently she is still consulting and teaching at Boston College (she's 90 now!).
One aspect that was missing from her book was that it revealed nothing about her personal life. Burgess kept her work separate from her family, though her husband seemed to be very supportive of her work. I believe he was an engineer and pilot, and would often fly her to Quantico! I know if Burgess was a man, no one would be curious about his family life, but for me, it's precisely because she was a woman in an unusual field that it would've been so fascinating to learn how she juggled and struggled. Perhaps that would be another book. It was probably for the best that A Killer By Design focused solely on her work with the FBI.
With the Netflix show, I could see why they portrayed Wendy Carr the way they did, to keep things simple. But in 2024, Hulu released "Mastermind: To Think Like a Killer"—a docu-series based on Burgess' 2021 book. The docu-series interviewed her adult children, so we got a tiny glimpse of her family life. For example, as a child, she had an uncle who had nurtured her love of music, but he was killed by his driver, who was secretly a drug addict. Ann's daughter mentioned how family members still found spots of blood behind lamps after he had died. His death changed the landscape for Ann, as it was her first experience with losing someone she loved in a violent way.
I do have one criticism about the book regarding the photos in the middle. One was of a victim killed by John Joseph Joubert. At first glance, the photo looked like a bloodied female mannequin lying half-buried in the snow. Once I read about Joubert, I realized it was the naked body of a 13yo boy. The 1970's colour-processing made the blood look particularly garish against the pale, orangey skin, like a still from a B-grade horror movie. The deep slashes left by the knife as it tore through the torso was clearly visible. I thought it was oddly exploitative to include such a disturbing photo because Burgess always wrote about respecting the victims, and it seemed wrong to depict a photo of a murdered adolescent.
No comments:
Post a Comment