By Kiersten White

A few Goodread reviews mentioned how it was recommended to have some
knowledge of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein as The Dark Descent of Elizabeth Frankenstein (2018) has many nods to the original source material. Here's one review:
“The
Dark Descent of Elizabeth Frankenstein is, essentially, a retelling of Frankenstein from the
perspective of Elizabeth - an orphan taken in by the Frankenstein family and
later the fiancée of Victor. I think this book will work much better for those
familiar with the original as it gives a lot of nods to the story. It's hard to
appreciate some of the clever twists the author takes without knowing what it's
based on.
Through her eyes, the tortured genius of Victor becomes a
sometimes frightening thing, and yet nothing is as terrifying as being a woman
in 18th Century Europe. The stifling constraints placed on women and their
ambitions are palpable as the story unfolds. It was so easy for a woman to be
dismissed as whiny or silly, or worse-- mad.
When Victor goes missing in Ingolstadt and writes no
letters, Elizabeth begins to track him down. Her investigation leads her down
dark paths to charnel houses and secret laboratories. What has Victor been up
to? Knowing the truth didn't take anything away from reading. In fact, it made
those mysterious dark shadows all the creepier.
This story largely fills in gaps in the original tale,
while shedding a completely new light on it. It's smart how Kiersten White has
managed to keep a lot the same, while also creating a bigger and very
different-looking picture.
The original Frankenstein calls into
question what it really means to be a monster and, indeed, who the real
monsters are. I think White might have answered that question.”
I had read Shelley’s Frankenstein when I was in my late
teens/early twenties, and I wasn’t sure whether I wanted to revisit the classic
1818 novel, so like the lazy, yet resourcefully efficient, reader that I am, I
borrowed the graphic novel version to quicky refresh my memory instead!
According
to Wikipedia, Elizabeth Lavenza and Victor Frankenstein were first cousins in
the original edition. In the revised third
edition (1831), Elizabeth was a non-relation adopted by the Frankenstein family. According to the graphic novel, Elizabeth was
portrayed as a saint, a self-sacrificing two-dimensional young woman who was
loved by the Frankenstein family. In The
Dark Descent of Elizabeth Frankenstein, she is naturally given much more depth
as the Frankenstein narrative is retold entirely from her perspective, and
there is a LOT more going on behind her innocent façade. In fact, she’s a calculating survivor who’s
determined to marry Victor, not because of love, but because it was her best option
as an orphaned young woman in the 19th century.
I’m
going to rely on another Goodreads review to summarize how I felt, as it really
does save me a lot of time, and time is precious right now!
“I do not think I expected one of the best books I read this
year to be a retelling of Frankenstein where it’s not just about the nature of
monstrousness, but about the power of women working together and escaping an
abusive relationship, with intoxicating writing and a morally grey lady as the
protagonist.
I absolutely loved the way Kiersten White wrote the abusive
relationship at the heart of this - we see the fucked-up nature of that
relationship long before Elizabeth does, but it never feels as if Elizabeth
“should’ve known better.” In every moment, she has full audience sympathy - in
every moment, even if I hated her actions, I understood her. The narrative puts
you so far into her mind that it is impossible to look away and it is glorious.
I think the focus on agency within a narrative should be
clear, but I really do want to say - this is why retellings are my favorite.
Taking a book that is about the essential nature of humanity from the
perspective of a man and flipping its themes solidly is something I will always
be in full support of - the meta-textuality of the narrative is absolutely
brilliant. And it’s not just about one woman - it’s about the relationships
between women and the strength found in them. Mary, Justine, and Elizabeth form
such fantastic relationships, and each feels so fully-formed in a way they may
not have in the original narrative.”
I will
add that, although there were plenty of hints revealing what a narcissistic
psychopath Victor was, the twist did take me a little by surprise, and I loved that. I think part of it was due to
re-reading the graphic novel that was based on the original novel. I kept expecting Frankenstein the monster to
kill Elizabeth, and I kept thinking that the monster was also responsible for
the deaths of Victor’s little brother William and of the servant Justine, but
that was not the case at all. I think if I hadn't read the graphic novel, I might've clued in sooner, but that's fine, I think I preferred being taken by surprise.
Kiersten
White did an excellent job setting up the plot twist, and not only that, the
denouement was really quite exciting and satisfying. Mary, the daughter of the book shop owner in Ingolstadt, also has a pivotal role in the denouement, and I’m
sure her name is a nod to Shelly. To
be sure, The Dark Descent of Elizabeth Frankenstein was one of my favourite
reads of the year so far. Highly
recommended!
p.s. This is yet another winner/recommendation from Monster, She Wrote !