Thursday, December 31, 2020

Year End Blurb

I'm quite pleased that I read 18 books this year.  My output has been steadily increasing since my low point in 2016. 

The 2020 pandemic certainly allowed me to read more, and I also bought quite a few new books (for myself as well as my daughter, who's turning out to be a fast reader like her Dad).

The vintage bookshelf inherited from my best friend/ex-roommate way back when has been in my daughter's room housing my on-deck (to-read) books which took up 2 out of 5 shelves.  

Her book collection has been growing so I got a couple of wall shelves by my desk, which is where most of my on-deck books now reside (the rest were relegate to the basement bookshelf).

Here is what they looked like in June:

I also joined a book club organized at my company.  Everything is done virtually via slack, Amazon and Zoom.  I made a suggestion to support a local bookstore, and I hope they consider it.

For 2021, I will set a realistic and hopefully achievable goal of reading a minimum of 21 books.


Monday, December 28, 2020

18. Generation Loss

By Elizabeth Hand

I first heard of Elizabeth Hand when her strange fantasy novel Winterlong ended up in my youthful possession.  The cover looked cool.  But after a few chapters, it didn’t do much for me, so I shelved it for years.  Unfortunately, this book can no longer be found.

Don't know if Generaion Loss is Hand’s first foray into the crime genre.   On Goodreads, a well-known crime author listed GL as one of his/her fave crime novels, featuring a punk photographer cum amateur investigator. That really intrigued me.

Hardened yet vulnerable, Cass Neary stumbles and mumbles her way through the story, pocketing other people’s meds along the way, never failing to keep a bottle of Jack Daniels hidden in the her worn leather jacket.  She constantly steals, sometimes for no reason other than to temporarily fuck up someone else.  What’s not to like? 

Generation Loss was also the first winner of the Shirley Jackson Award for outstanding achievement in psychological suspense, horror and the dark fantastic.  Not surprised. The opening paragraph even references Diane Arbus. I'm so in.

I thought that Generation Loss shared many similarities with The Girl with The Dragon Tattoo, which was published posthumously in 2005.  Generation Loss came out in 2007.  No idea if Hand had read Stig Larsson’s international bestseller, but the plot seems stamped from the exact same template.

[SPOILERS] 

Cassandra Neary is a has-been photographer; Mikael Blomkvist a disgraced journalist.  Cass is a big-time fuck up; Mikael fucked up big time. 

Cass does not have a side kick, but like Lisbeth, she is a rape survivor and the damage inflicted from that continues to haunt her and define some of her actions.

Decades later, burnt-out and broke, Cass gets a gig interviewing a reclusive retired legendary photographer, and a former idol of hers; Mikael is offered an opportunity to write a book for a former captain of industry and interviews his aging reclusive relatives.  The interviewees in both novels are extremely unpleasant. 

There is a missing girl involved in both novels that prompts the ‘investigation’. 

Both protagonists journey to a remote village in the middle of nowhere during the cold winter. 

They meet various characters and gradually get drawn into the town gossip and its sordid histories. 

Both protagonists get drawn into the lair of the killer, which is located in an even more remote part of that remote area. 

The killer is lucid but utterly off his rocker, and both have a victim held hostage when they are discovered. 

The differences

Cass is a washed out, damaged piece of work, always looking for a way to escape sobriety;  Mikael is none of those things.

Meditations on photography and art – a key factor that elevates Generation Loss and one of the reasons why it’s a cult novel. It name drops many outsider artists and figures from the legendary NYC punk scene. 

Dennis Ahearn's insanity was caused by mercury & cyanide poisoning from the photochemicals used to process his bizarre daguerrotypes and elaborate rituals; Martin Vanger’s derangement stemmed from his psychopathic father and when he came into his own as a serial killer, he did away with his dad’s elaborate symbolic rituals. 

Themes and things that I liked in the novel:  

That photographers have a way of seeing things that ordinary people don’t.  Cass Neary was once full of unrealized and raw potential with “remarkable if totally useless” gifts.  

     And, just as I knew the first photo was by Aphrodite, I knew this one had been taken by a man. Phil used to make fun of me for claiming I could identify a photographer, no matter how obscure, by his or her image. He ranked on me even worse when I once drunkenly announced I could identify the gender of a bunch of unknowns whose pictures hung at a small gallery in DUMBO.

      But I did it. I nailed every single one.

     “That’s amazing, Cass,” Phil said. “Another remarkable if totally useless skill.”

     Even now, I couln’i tell you how it works. It’s like me picking up damage, like there’s a smell there, or a subliminal taste. And you’d thank that would be an easy call to make with this picture, because it sure looked like it would taste like cheesecake.

[I personally like to think I have remarkable if totally useless skills.  Take the Auto Motion setting in flat screen televisions, for instance.  I was at a friend’s house watching TV and I could immediately tell that Auto Motion was on.  I tried to show her the difference between having that setting off and on, but try as she might, she couldn’t tell the difference at all.  The difference I saw was like day and night.  An older memory was my high school photography class, back when we had darkrooms and shot on black and white film. We had a test where our teaacher would show slides of well-known works from the canonized photographers.  I was able to nail all one hundred of them and correctly identify the Atgets, Cartier-Bressons, Langes, and Franks.  Suffice to say, Mr. Booker was impressed.] 

This novel also reminded me of another book I recently read, the vastly inferior Broken Monsters by Lauren Beukes. This is mostly due to the mad artist-serial killers who would murder then incorporate dead bodies into their art.  Generation Loss would have made a good antidote to the unsatisfying and mediocre Broken Monsters.  

However, patience is also needed for Generation Loss as it’s a slow burn all the way to the climactic ending.  The bulk of it is psychological and character-driven with a gradual build up.   And if you don’t like the protagonist, you’re done for – because the reader will get submerged, if not drowned, in Cass’s internal fucked up psyche. 

All in all this was a great book to end the year with.  It may be flawed, but it's flawed in a great way.

I was also pleased that Olman found the original hardback for Xmas, from Dark Carnival, I believe.

 

Sunday, December 13, 2020

17. The Cricket in Times Square

By George Selden & illus by Garth Williams   


 

Sunday, December 06, 2020

16. The Queen’s Gambit

 By Walter Tevis   

 

I like writing about people who are somewhat outcasts from society. … Highly intelligent, out of place characters. I like to write about alienation.”   -- Walter Tevis 

 --------

The quote was from the Ringer article Olman had sent me not long after the Netflix series debuted, and it sealed my decision to read the book first.

I even ordered it from my local bookstore D&Q along with some Christmas books for my kid and began it immediately after The Stand.  I finished in 5 days.  Right up there with Mary Katherine Blackwood from We Have Always Lived in the Castle, Beth Harmon has become one of my favourite literary characters. 

I was extremely glad of my decision to read the book before watching the show, which I also enjoyed tremendously.  I wanted to compare the series to the novel, not the other way around.  But since I would never have read this book were it not for the Netflix series, this is more like a comparison than a review.  Though I was pleased by how the series remained quite faithful to its source material, there were some notable differences I observed:


************* MAJOR SPOILERS AHEAD **************


The series shifted Beth’s age one year later, so Beth learned chess from Mr Schaibel at 9 instead of 8; and she had her first chess tournament at 14, not 13.  Makes sense in the show, cuz Anya is quite ta-aaa-all.

The Netflix version of Beth Harmon still embodied Tevis' Beth Harmon at heart, but her character has been made more relatable, self-assured and socially adjusted than her literary counterpart.  The Netflix Beth Harmon was also more glamorous and fashionable, although both versions shared an appreciation for high quality clothing.  

Anya Taylor-Joy has a voluptuousness that was not evident in the literary version (in the show, a Russian chauffeur made a comment that Beth looks like Ann Margret).  In contrast, Trevis’ Beth Harmon was described as quite plain-looking with brown hair although she does grow up "good-looking" by the time she runs into Townes in Las Vegas.  I envisioned Beth to be a Carey Mulligan good-looking instead of an Ann Margret good-looking, y'know what I mean?

The series provided intermittent flashbacks of Beth’s biological mom and fleeting recollections of her father. It also hinted and later revealed that the car accident was meant to kill both mother and daughter.  The source material did not indulge in flashbacks, though I can understand why the show would do so.  The series also fleshed out Alice Harmon's background ie. she had a Ph.D in Math at Cornell, thus Beth inherited her mom’s gift.

Alma Wheatley’s background also got fleshed out in the series, ie. she was a concert pianist before her early career was cut short by an accidental pregnancy, which explains why she was stuck with her bitter, resentful husband.  Her character comes across as less pathetic compared to the book, which portrayed Mrs. Wheatley as a superficial but kind-hearted person.  She was another counterpoint to Beth’s character, as Alma was someone who could’ve made something of herself had it not been for her loser of a husband. The series doesn’t reveal what happened to Alma's biological child, however.

In Beth’s first tournament in Kentucky, the man at the registration booth has been transformed as college-aged twins in the series; at first disdainful of Beth but later became her biggest fans; she ran into Mike and Matt in later tournaments and they developed a nice camaraderie, which I thought was a nice touch.  The series did a stellar job portraying the registration scene where Beth learns about ratings, the U.S. Open, etc from the patronizing twins, as well as the excitement and newness of her first tournament.

The series also did a nice job in the casting of Townes, a handsome, charismatic chess player -- the only man that Beth pined after.  Unlike the book, which portrayed their fleeting relationship in a more nuanced way, the show amped up their sexual tension when Townes invited Beth over to his Las Vegas hotel room.  This was not in the book but just when you thought Townes was going to make a move, a man entered the room to get dressed for the pool, strongly implying that Townes was gay.

The series version of Benny Watts was an amalgamation of the rough-hewn yet articulate beatnik chess bum with a knife that Beth encountered at her 2nd tournament in Cincinnati and a skinny white guy, whereas in the book, Benny was a more typical-looking chess player (just a skinny white guy).  I wasn’t so keen on this, but I understood why the series wanted to do it this way. 

The Netflix Vasily Borgov has the authoritarian scowl down, but he's much more distinguished looking than the novel version:  "a short, heavy man, not unlike a gorilla himself, with jutting brow ridges, bushy eyebrows..."  The only common factors are the "coarse, black hair and impassive look."  Still, the actor who plays Borgov was well cast.

The series also beefed up all of Beth’s female relationships which all provided various counterpoints:  

Margaret, Beth’s former high school bully became an unhappy housewife saddled with babies who also had a propensity for liquor. 

Ann Packard, who was Beth’s first opponent at the Lexington tournament, became a pre-med student, making a pilgrimage to see a burned-out Beth defend her championship years later.

Benny’s very striking friend, Jenny, became Chloe in the series, a French model-cum-vagabond.  Unlike the source material where Jenny only made one appearance in NYC, Chloe reappeared in Paris and was partly responsible for Beth’s bender the night before her final match against Borgov.

In the novel’s portrayal of the Paris tournament, Beth was stone-cold sober and “played beautifully” but she was still defeated by Borgov.  In the series, Beth was hungover from her bender with Chloe, arrived late for her final match with Borgov (something that the book version of Beth would never have done) and constantly drank from her water glass throughout the match due to dehydration.  She would hesitate before moving her pieces and a tear fell from her left eye as she resigned.  I felt the show unnecessarily over-dramatized this scene and much preferred the original version. 

In the series, Harry Beltik’s farewell was much more gentle compared to his cold and sudden departure in the novel. In the book, Beltik was portrayed like a jilted lover, and never seen again; in the series, he remained a concerned friend who keyed into Beth’s pill addiction and alcoholism.  

In the novel, after realizing how isolated she was, Beth reached out to Jolene, whereas in the series, Jolene made a dramatic appearance at Beth’s doorstep.  She was the one who informed Beth that Mr Shaibel had died and suggested they go to the funeral (in the book, it was Beth who made the decision to go).  

I was expecting to see a physical training montage of Jolene whipping Beth back into shape as the book portrayed so well, and was surprised when this was omitted.  Instead we just see a couple of scenes of them playing squash.  What’s worse is that in the show, after Beth had declined to represent the Christian Crusaders, Jolene offered to lend Beth the money she needed to travel to the Moscow tournament.  The writers of the show made a clever guise of Jolene’s motive (she’s no guardian angel but family) perhaps to potentially ward off criticism from black viewers.  Again, I feel like it was another attempt to make Beth more relatable and less of an oddball loner.  They would rather beef up Beth’s female relationships at the expense of her being fiercely independent and resourceful.  In the book, Beth simply used what’s left of her savings from having to buy her house from Mr. Wheatley, the anti-Dad, in order to go to the Moscow tournament.

In the series, Townes reappeared as a reporter covering the Moscow tournament, surprising Beth.  After clearing up their previous misstep, they became fast friends with Townes offering to become her second.  
 
This was the only part I disliked in the show:  during her adjournment from her final match with Borgov, Beth got the call from Benny and his chess buddies, just like in the book.  However, the series added a bunch of other characters, like Harry Beltik!  At Benny’s apartment in NYC!  What was even more ridiculous was that the twins Mike and Matt were there too!  This would have been unlikely in the book, and was obvious the show writers wanted more drama and again, they wanted Beth to be more relatable. 

What was marvellous about the novel was how it described Beth's interior world, yet this would be difficult to translate to the screen.  In the show, some of Beth's internal monologue was given to Alma Wheatley 's character, such as when they were having dinner at a restaurant, and Alma started coughing over her cocktail.  Beth asked Alma if maybe her drinking was making her sick and Almas went "oh please" and used this line from the novel:

        She had flirted with alcohol for years. It was time to consummate the relationship.

Which doesn't really make much sense as Alma has consummated that relationship long ago!

Things I liked that the series had faithfully adapted from the book:
 
Beth having her first period during her first chess tournament.  I loved how Tevis portrayed it in a way that was both matter-of-fact and significant.
 
Beth began pulling a long sheet from the roll of toilet paper and folding it into a tightly packed rectangle. The pain in her abdomen had eased. She was menstruating, and she had just beaten Goldmann: 1997. She put the folded paper into her panties, pulled them up tight, straightened her skirt and walked confidently back into the playing area.

When Beth had the apartment to herself after the college kids took off to see a movie in another town.
 
     She was alone, and she liked it.  It was the way she had learned everything important in her life.
 
Although the series did a pretty good job in staying true to Beth's character in the novel, there were some notable exceptions.

One thing that stuck out in Beth's first tournament (and only upon re-reading the book and re-watching the show in December 2022) is that the series made it out that Beth only won the match with Beltik after she took the green pill in the bathroom, which helped her envision the game above her head.  In the book, Beth just needed to sit down in the stall and close her eyes to gather herself until she was able to find her move, without any help from a pill.  

The series wrongly pushed the idea that the pills help Beth visualize her chess moves, whereas the book made it clear that the tranqulizers primarily help to quell Beth's active mind so that she can sleep at night, and more importantly, Beth needs to have a clear mind to play chess effectively.  In fact, the pills cloud her thinking, and if she did take a pill the night before a match, she'd have to wake up extra early and down some cups of coffee in order to clear her mind.  And this was when she was still a middle teen.  So in the show, when Beth's in Russia, she told Townes that she needs her mind clouded by drugs and alcohol to visualize a chess match, it didn't make sense.  So the show plays up Beth's addiction so that she can learn to be free of it, just so there's more drama.
 

Tuesday, December 01, 2020

15. The Stand (Complete and Uncut Edition)

By Stephen King 

While retroactively posting, I was trying to remember what I was reading during October as it had no entry, then realized I was trying to read Neil Stephenson’s Snow Crash.  When The Stand arrived at my door on November 3rd, I abandoned Snow Crash as I had an urge to read this post-apocalyptic pandemic classic.  As my first foray, I figured I’d go for the complete & uncut edition, which was basically an expansion of the 800+ page original novel.  

In the preface, King explained “I am republishing The Stand as it was originally written not to serve myself or any individual reader, but to serve a body of readers [fans] who have asked to have it.”

It took me about a month to read all 1153 pages (though some of the pages were virtual… read on).  And I can confirm that the uncut edition is meant for fans.  The paperback has the heft and feel of a brick.  I would sometimes take breaks, not because I needed to stop reading, but to rest my hands from holding the bloody thing.  The original edition would have served me fine, but as a completist, at least I can say that I read the whole thing as it was 'meant' to be read.

This link highlights the sections that were added in the uncut edition. 

This article sums it all up with these quotes that hit the nail on the head:

The Uncut edition.. manages to feel too long and too short at the same time. It’s shaky, shaggy, a woefully dated product of the ’70s, and totally problematic by 21st century standards of political correctness.

Within the entire Boulder Free Zone community — which eventually numbers in the thousands — Mother Abigail is the only person who is described as black. That’s right, kids: Stephen King’s utopic Free Zone society contains exactly one (1) black person. Other than that, the Free Zone is a diverse tapestry, featuring white people from Maine, white people from Texas, white people from New York, and white people from Ohio.

And yet it’s obvious why The Stand is so often name-checked as King’s crowning achievement…. Like many great “genre” writers, the majority of King’s work has focused on ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances. And while his imaginative plots were the hooks that drew readers in, Stephen King fans have always connected with his books because of those ordinary people — protagonists as flawed and insecure as the rest of us, who are richly brought to life through their inner monologues and memories. It’s the interior, psychological world that gives King’s best works their jet-fuel.   

Now here are some of my thoughts.    

I can see how The Walking Dead graphic novels owed a huge debt to The Stand and made up for The Stand’s utter lack of diversity with its range of characters.  Without knowing much about The Stand, I was expecting an end times pre- + post-pandemic novel, and wasn’t expecting a metaphysical battle between good and evil thrown in there.  This post-apocalyptic spin on Christianity didn't work for me.

To quote the source itself:  Bad shit keeps happening to us because we never learn the lesson. Even when the armies are destroyed, their toys are left behind, and we can’t resist picking them up again. The virus of evil and domination that exists in humanity’s heart can never be fully extinguished.”  

Human beings are perfectly capable of being batshit evil without any help from Satan.  The true horror is the cesspit of humanity itself  Which is why I felt that is was quite unnecessary to have The Dark Man. And if there's going to be a supernatural adversary make it a supernatural battle of epic proportions, which never happened.  Instead, a big bomb goes off and destroys all the bad guys in one swell swoop.  Anti-climactic, to say the least.

This is why the under-rated Z for Zachariah was able to convey similar themes much more effectively with 1/50 of pages and characters!  The two remaining survivors in America manage to play out the history of humanity without any need for supernatural elements.  But The Stand is still a great ride.  Yes, it’s bloated and dated, but it’s still a gripping epic'ish read - a contemporary fat fantasy novel.  Olman loved The Stand when he read the original version but has forgotten much of it.  What was memorable for him was the beginning how it describes how the virus spreads from one person to the rest of America.

Some other random thoughts:  

Dayna was the only woman who really kicked ass.  In fact, she’s the most kick-ass character, period.  She was first introduced as a prisoner held by marauding rapists who later bashed one of their skulls in.  She joined Stu’s crew who made it to Boulder and was later sent out to infiltrate Las Vegas.  So why wasn't Dayna a core character?  The only female core character was boring Fran, who didn’t do much except be:  pregnant, a moral compass, a girlfriend to Stu Redman, and a trigger for incelly Harry’s conversion to evil.   

Dayna had no back story, but she had the best action scene where she confronted, then outwitted, the Dark Man.  Even though this ended with a dramatic sacrifice, Dayna did it on her own terms.   Dayna’s death also had the most graphic and memorable illustration.  In the text, it wasn’t clear to me how she impaled herself on the broken window, but the illustration made it explicitly clear!

Some other sections in the novel seemed to have missed editorial eyes.  Just small details like when the Judge is in the middle of nowhere after travelling for several days and he stops at a café “for a sandwich and coffee”.  Huh?  I can see how he could have boiled water and made coffee himself in an abandoned café, but where did he get the bread???

But I did like this passage with the Judge on his spying mission:

            By Rawlins, heʼd had enough. He turned northwest on I-287, skirted the Great Divide Basin, and had camped two days later in Wyomingʼs northwest corner, east of Yellowstone. Up here, the roads were almost completely empty. Crossing Wyoming and eastern Idaho had been a frightening, dreamlike experience. He would not have thought that the feeling of death could have set so heavily on such an empty land, nor on his own soul. But it was there—a malign stillness under all that big western sky, where once the deer and the Winnebagos had roamed. It was there in the telephone poles that had fallen over and not been repaired; it was there in the cold, waiting stillness of the small towns he drove his Scout through: Lamont, Muddy Gap, Jeffrey City, Lander, Crowheart.

        His loneliness grew with his realization of the emptiness, with his internalization of the death feeling. He grew more and more certain that he was never going to see the Boulder Free Zone again, or the people who lived there—Frannie, Lucy, the Lauder boy, Nick Andros. He began to think he knew how Cain must have felt when God exiled him to the land of Nod.

        Only that land had been to the east of Eden.

        The Judge was now in the West.

The ending of The Stand was somewhat disappointing and unsatisfying.  I liked the section in which Stu, Tom Cullen and Kojak the dog made their arduous winter journey back home, but the return to Boulder definitely felt rushed.  It was mentioned that Fran had moved in with Lucy Swann (Larry Underwood's gf-widow/future baby mama), but what about ex-feral boy Joe/Leo?  He was only mentioned briefly but nothing was mentioned about who was caring for him?  And nothing on his reaction to Larry being gone?  What’s the point of an expanded edition and devoting so much time to ‘character development’ when not everyone’s ending gets resolved?

And then some months after their baby is born, Stu and Fran move out East to Maine.  There was no goodbye to Tom.  I guess the Christmas scene was enough?  But Stu and Tom went through so much together during those two months, I was surprised that King didn’t devote even a short farewell exchange between them. 

But I think there’s a more practical reason why editors wanted to slim it down – less possibility of printing mistakes!!!   Here is the second part of this review that explains why.    

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

On Friday the 13th, there was a swatting incident at Ubisoft that began as a ‘hostage’ situation.  When Olman came home from grocery shopping, I told him what was happening and he mentioned how he saw cops and police vehicles blocking St-Viateur.   Later that evening, I was reading The Stand, and at page 418, I realized I was reading the same passage again on the next page.  The bloody book was missing pages 419 to 450!

This was the second time a printing error happened to a book I was reading, the first being Far From the Madding Crowd.

What are the chances of that?  Let’s compare with Olman, who has read at least 10x more books than I even had, has never experienced printing mistakes with any of the books he has read!

Not only that, I groaned aloud when I realized later in my reading that my POS copy of The Stand was missing yet another chunk – pages 687 to 718.  This time, I didn’t notice until p.750 when it repeated 719 again. 

I remembered wondering why King never wrote about Larry finally meeting incelly Harry in person.  Pissed me off!

Unlike Madding, which was bought secondhand, The Stand was purchased new, so I was able to submit a refund to Amazon as I didn’t want a replacement for this thick brick of a paperback.  So it worked out as a mixed blessing in the end.   OIman easily found me a PDF, so I was able to read the missing pages and then resume my reading with the paperback.

I had until Feb 2021 to send the book back so I had no problems finishing it by then.  Another reason to finish it was that I had finally received The Queen’s Gambit from Drawn & Quarterly about a week prior.  I so wanted to get that out of the way so I could embark on the Netflix mini series that everyone’s been raving about.

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

April 01, 2021 - I finished the new series based on The Stand on Prime.  I heard that the series was a real disappointment for fans of the book.  Since I'm not a fan, I thought it did a decent job, thought there were some serious flaws.

Here's my Letterboxd review.