Showing posts with label murder. Show all posts
Showing posts with label murder. Show all posts

Monday, March 11, 2013

4. Deep Water

By Patricia Highsmith

This was the most unpleasant Highsmith novel I’ve read so far, mostly due to its cold portrayal of a disintegrated marriage, and the author’s razor-sharp misanthropic gaze is unflinching as ever. Vic and Melinda Van Allen’s marriage isn’t just loveless, it is also utterly dysfunctional and destructive. Think Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf, but instead of Richard Burton as a raging alcoholic, the husband is a burgeoning sociopath hiding beneath a quiet, civilized façade.

Deep Water was one of Highsmith’s early novels. Published in 1957, it seemed ahead of its time in its depiction of a highly unconventional marriage arrangement. Rather than having a divorce (and perhaps admitting defeat), Vic allows his wife Melinda to see other men. But this is complicated by the fact that the couple lives in the suburban town of Little Wesley, so Vic bears the social implications of the cuckolded husband with his sexually loose wife.

The fact that Melinda had been carrying on like this for more than three years gave Vic the reputation in Little Wesley of having a saintlike patience and forbearance, which in turn flattered Vic’s ego. Vic knew that Horace and Phil Cowan and everybody else who knew the situation—which was nearly everybody—considered him odd for enduring it, but Vic didn’t mind at all being considered odd. In fact, he was proud of it in a country in which most people aimed at being exactly like everybody else. 

But matters are also complicated by the fact that Vic and Melinda, each nonconformist in their own right, are so different from one another.  Where Vic - despite his lack of emotion towards his wife - cares deeply for his daughter, Melinda seems downright indifferent towards her own flesh and blood.  Where Vic is educated and literate, Melinda is vulgar and has terrible taste in men.

He wouldn’t object to her having a man of some stature and self-respect, a man with some ideas in his head, as a lover, Vic thought. But he was afraid Melinda would never choose that kind or that that kind would never choose her. Vic could visualize a kind of charitable, fair-minded, civilized arrangement in which all three of them might be happy ad benefit from contact with one another. Dostoyevsky had known what he meant. Goethe might have understood, too. 

The problem is that Melinda keeps picking the wrong sort of man who rubs Vic the wrong way. And Vic keeps thwarting Melinda, even falsely admitting he murdered McRae, one of Melinda’s former lovers, to frighten off one of her current paramours. Melinda gets frustrated and becomes increasingly vindictive towards Vic by making him look increasingly foolish and emasculated in front their small circle of friends.  Soon, she begins seeing a common bar pianist:

… And the thought of Melinda dragging Charley to parties at the Cowans’ and the Mellers’—she hadn’t done it yet, but it was coming, he knew—the shame of endorsing socially a guttersnipe like Charley De Lisle seemed more than he could bear. And everybody would know that Melinda had picked up the first man she could find after the McRae story had exploded. Everybody would know now that he was disgusted and helpless to combat it, however indifferent he pretended to be, because obviously he had made an effort to hold off Melinda’s lovers by telling the story about McRae. 

As with the way of most Highsmith novels, a murder soon occurs. And like many of Highsmith’s novels, you always feel some measure of empathy towards the murderer. Part of it is because the murderer is so rational in his justification of murder, he really does comes across as superior to those around him, but mostly it’s because Highsmith put a lot of herself in the character of Victor Van Allen. Like Vic, the author took pride in her misanthropy and nonconformity. Murder, in Highsmith’s thinking, was probably the ultimate act of nonconformity.

Another interesting detail was that both author and character kept snails as pets. In any case, though I found it an interesting read, I was also relieved to finish the book -- it was so dark and unpleasant. But for Highsmith fans, I think Deep Water gives you a gleam of insight into the author’s personality via Vic’s internal thoughts. From what little I know of Highsmith’s bio, she was a difficult person to like and get along with. If you don’t think you’ll ever read this book, I’ll include the last bit of the ending, which is both telling and chilling:

Vic kept looking at Wilson’s wagging jaw and thinking of the multitude of people like him on the earth, perhaps half the people on earth were of his type, or potentially his type, and thinking it was not bad at all to be leaving them. The ugly birds without wings. The mediocre who perpetuated mediocrity, who really fought and died for it. He smiled at Wilson’s grim, resentful, the-world-owes-me-a-living face, which was the reflection of the small, dull mind behind it, and Vic cursed it and all it stood for. Silently, and with a smile, and with all that was left of him, he cursed it.

 For once, I read an online book review after writing my own, and was delighted to find a similar interpretation in this particular review from The Independent.

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Book 4 – The Lovely Bones

By Alice Sebold

I was of two somewhat opposing feelings before I started reading this book. A part of me was intrigued by the morbidness of reading the first person account of fourteen year old Susie Salmon, who gets raped and murdered by her neighbour. The other part of me regarded with disdain the fact that said girl was narrating her story as a floaty spirit in heaven.

It took me a while to get into the book. It vacillates from being a about a family trying to come to terms with their loss and grief, a suspense story where the father and sister of the murdered girl work together to uncover the identity of the killer and magic realist flights of fancy where the narrator tries to fulfill her girlish yet earthly fantasies.

The first two factors were what made the novel appealing for me. The world of 1970s suburbia was nicely portrayed and the characters of the family members well developed, especially the women, such as Susie’s mother and younger sister, Lindsey. The inclusion of a background story for serial killer George Harvey was interesting too. As well as having the detective, Len Fenerman, as a well-meaning yet sadly ineffective good guy.

There are also some powerful images in The Lovely Bones that stick in your head well after you're done with the book (whether you like it or not): Susie trapped with her murderer in the underground "clubhouse" hidden beneath an abandoned cornfield; Susie's dismembered body locked inside an old safe that's been submerged in a sinkhole, never to be discovered; Susie's sister Lindsey running off with killer George Harvey's sketchbook clutched in her hand, her soccer jersey disappearing into the bush (one of the few satisfying moments in the book).

Despite this, I generally side with the opinion of the NYT review, that although Sebold "maintains almost perfect balance" for this "high-wire act for a first-time novelist", it was the ridiculous wish-fulfillment ending that pretty much ruined the whole thing for me.

Basically, Susie’s old classmate, Ruth, has clairvoyant tendencies so Susie manages to possess Ruth’s body for a little while so she can make love to her high school could-have-been sweetheart, Ray Singh. Oh, and Ray, for some inexplicable reason, just knew that Ruth was actually Susie. Like, geez, come on! That scenario like really burst the narrative bubble for me.

To sum it up with a blurb from Observer reviewer, Philip Hensher: "very readable but ultimately it seems like a slick, overpoweringly saccharine and unfeeling exercise in sentiment and whimsy". I would disagree that the writing was unfeeling, but there were moments where it felt like Sebold was trying a little too hard.

The end.